Category Archives: cell phones

Mobiles, QRs and TAGs Oh My!

MS MOBI TAG

These little square boxes have been popping up on just about everything lately, but what do they do?  Quite simply, they are called Quick Response or QR codes

My bet is that you are going to see a ton of these things at MACUL 2011.   The REMC $AVE project will be running a contest using them on the conference floor.

These 3D barcodes enable you to use the camera on your mobile device with a small application to decode the symbol.  Once decoded, a URL, text message, contact or other information will be displayed. 

You will find two competing types of codes in the market, and both do pretty much the same thing – that is, give the end user some information on their device quickly just by scanning the tag.   Microsoft has their TAG system and you can download the reader for supported devices.

The other system, Quick Response, has been around longer than the MS TAG and has a larger presence in the market.   img.php You’ll need an application to decode these as well, so take a look at this nice list and pick one out for your mobile device.

Uses For The Classroom

There are some pretty innovative uses for QR codes in the classroom too.  You can create, print and attach QRs to objects in your classroom.  You students can then scan the code and be taken to more information about the object, text of item.

Chemistry teachers love putting these things on chemicals and equipment to instantly transport their learners to more information about each.  Think about attaching them to the inside cover of a book to transport the learner to a book review or a classroom blog book report.  The possibilities are endless. 

So when you see me at the conference, say hi and scan my badge. I’ll be wearing a QR code that will take you to a secret location.   And while you are at it, scan the two codes in this blog post to be let in on top secret information.

MACUL 2011 Almost Here!

So, I was sitting down to work on my presentation and I found myself wondering what MACUL would hold in store for me this year. I always like to pick a task to accomplish at the conference, something specific to seek out and learn about. One year it was RSS, another it was Web 2.0. I’m not sure what that will be this year, so I figured I’d check out what information was available on the MACUL site.

So far the only thing to go on is the registration booklet. The full conference brochure will be ready at the end of February. You can’t tell a lot from just the title of a talk, but I’m gonna try anyway. I found an interesting breakdown. For sake of comparison I also looked at the 2010 registration booklet. With sessions I only have titles to go from, but the workshops give full descriptions.

Here’s what I know saw:

  • In 2010 I just had to search for “Phone” to find all the stuff on learning with mobile devices. In 2011, I need to use phone, iPad, mobile, Android, and iPod.  There seems to be about twice as many talks and workshops about the use of mobile devices in the classroom this year as last. That would be 16 listed this year. More sessions will incorporate them I’m sure, but we won’t know till March.
  • Web 2.0 seems to be falling away. Last year there were at least 13 sessions listed with Web 2.0 in the title or description in the registration book. This year there are only 5. However, Blog jumped from one to five and wiki increased a bit too. I guess this year we’re being a bit more specific.
  • The use of video and podcasting are down a little. I guess something had to go to make enough room for all the extra cell phone stuff. This one is near and dear to me. <Shamless Plug> Come see me on Friday – Break the Cycle—Create Videos So you Can Stop Lecturing </Shamless Plug>

So, what am I going to search out this? I’m still not sure. I really like the idea of tablet devices like the iPad, but there really aren’t enough viable options in that space yet. Don’t get me wrong, I love my iPad, but I want to see some competitors. Next year will probably be the year of the tablet, but not this year, I think.

This year looks like the year of the mobile device, focusing primarily on cell phones with the iPad and iTouch thrown in for a little spice. Seems to be a “use what they have in their pockets” approach. This is particularly interesting when you consider that most schools ban such devices.

What are you hoping to get out of this year’s MACUL Conference? Feel free to chime in below in the comments, or better yet surf on over and share on MACULspace.

Considering Student Cell Phones? with Liz Kolb

Where you can find more:

What is your biggest Concern? This session is the first of three that Kolb is running at MACUL. This one is focused on allaying

TweetDeck-1

From the TwitterVerse

concerns from administration, tech coordinators, and parents.

One reason we resist is that we didn’t learn with cell phones and so we are hesitant to see them as necessary to education. Change is always hard, but in the long run is often well worth the effort.

Some concerns that lead to the why we should use cell phones in the classroom include the lack of reliable internet access in many homes in the country and the lack of any sort of 1 to 1 technology in the classroom. There is a fundamental shift in the 21st century workforce, especially in Michigan. Employers are calling for schools to integrate more mobile use skills so that they will be ready when they graduate.

There was a question about what specific skills kids need that we’re not teaching or that they aren’t already learning on their own. Kolb’s answer was to say they need to know how to use mobile devices to quickly find information and collaborate in a professional manner. They need to be familiar with phones as useful tools.

Believe it or not, research shows that kids who text a lot are actually better spellers than kids who don’t. They are also better able to summarize information.

What Are the Problems:

  • Cheating – 26% of teenagers admitted to using cellphones to cheat. Many of these kids truly don’t see it as cheating.
  • 70% of schools ban cell phones on campus, but students bring them anyway. In these banned schools students send out at least three texts/class
  • Sexting – Pass a note in class and it goes away quickly. Send a digital copy and it will exist forever! Many kids believe sending pictures on a phone is private and won’t become public. In some cases kids are charged with child pornography for taking pictures of themselves.

The problems outlined above have little to do with students owning cell phones. Students don’t really know how to use cell phone appropriately. When we get them out in the classroom we can begin to teach students how to be responsible. Most students really don’t know what happens to the information after they hit send on their phones. We need to teach them and if we do we can get access to some cool tech tools for our classroom.

For more on cell phones in education follow the links above and go to the other sessions Liz Kolb is running:

  • Developing Curriculum Based Projects by Using Student Cell Phones: Thursday – 1:00
  • Student Cell Phones in Learning: Friday – 11:30

Too Much Stuff! How do I decide?

So, this morning over my coffee I’m going through the PDF copy of the program for MACUL. I do this in PDF form rather than the online planner so I can highlight and annotate. This helps later as there are usually 2-4 different sessions happening at any given time that I want to attend in addition to informal stuff that’s not in the online planner (Twitter Meet-Up or Guerrilla sessions for example)

Now, how do I prioritize the talks I want to see? First, featured speakers and keynotes rank higher for me. Then specific subject matter, then location. What I mean by location is, are there two talks happening at the same time near each other? If so I’ll probably pick one of those as I know if it ends up not being for me I can duck out and sneak into the other one. Yes, I am that guy.

Anyway, I still end up with tough choices to make. Hence I’m starting now. My next step is to Google the presenter (assuming I’ve never seen them before). The tech-savvy presenters at MACUL are often all over the web, this way I get to learn more about what they do then is provided in the tiny blurb in the program.

For example, there are multiple sessions on the use of cell phones in the classroom. There are a number of sessions by featured speaker Liz Kolb as well as one by Elliot Soloway and Cathie Norris. For me, it looks like the content offered by Kolb is a closer match to my interests than that of Soloway and Norris, but from videos of Soloway and Norris available on the net I bet they give a good presentation. There’s an example below. As it turns out I probably won’t go to their session as it looks like Soloway and Norris focus mainly on primary rather than secondary education. One choice made, about 30 more to go!

The technology of stopwatches…

In my humble first-year-in-the-building opinion my school has a problem with stopwatches. I’ve been told that, for whatever reason, when we buy them they just don’t seem to last. Maybe they are a poor brand, maybe the battery is shoddy, perhaps there is a seventh grader jumping up and down on them when I’m not looking – it is middle school – I don’t know.

I do know this was terribly frustrating as my students were sharing the remaining working stopwatches timing our science investigations. 27 students and four stopwatches is not a good ratio for efficiency. Then, thankfully, one of my students clued me in to the fact that almost every student was walking around with a stopwatch in their pocket, oftentimes more than one. “They’re called cell phones and iPods, Mr. Rommel, duh” she said rolling her eyes at me. And you know what I deserved the eye roll.

I mean, I consider myself a pretty capable problem solver but I had never even thought to have the kids use the technology they already had at school anyway. I had completely overlooked the obvious.

I agree there are probably a lot better ways of using these tools than as stop watches, but you know what iPods as stopwatches is a start.

What I mean is if we don’t start embracing the technology students arrive at our classrooms with then we are denying them the very tools they use everyday to learn on their own and that is denying them authenticity in their learning. It creates a disconnect. I know this seems to be a huge leap to make from stopwatches but I see it in student’s faces when they are made to only use resources which they feel no longer apply to them. How many kids do you know who would use an atlas to find directions? In fact how many of you use an atlas for directions? (For the record I’m not saying stop teaching kids how to use an atlas, I am saying stop teaching kids how to use an atlas without also having a conversation on current ways of finding directions.) The disconnect may not be there for all students mind you, (I realize not everyone has TomTom mounted on their dash) but for a sizable and growing amount it is all too prevalent.

So why not start simple? It’s an easy way to foster a connection with students, to embrace “their” technology even in a small way, an easy way for them to feel current, and in some way empowered. I think it also provides you with a low maintenance opportunity to bring a reluctant colleague along on this technology discussion we should be having in our buildings.

I trust once the conversation began you wouldn’t let it stop there.

In fact you could share this bit of information with them: five of the top ten novels on the 2007 Japanese best seller’s list began as cell phone novels. Have them read for themself this article“>here in this January 20 article from the New York Times. Cell phone novels, cellular storytelling, whatever you want to call it digital natives are going to use technology in ways I would not think of. I mean seriously, how many of you would sit down and write a novel on a thumboard? What about read a novel on your cell phone? Whatever our collective answer as educators, here is a key sentence from the article:

“Indeed, many cellphone novelists had never written fiction before, and many of their readers had never read novels before, according to publishers.

There it is. Plain as day. In education we should be ready to embrace anything which promotes learning. If writing on a cell phone causes someone to read a novel who never has before then by all means tap away. I understand the article is referring to a segment of the generation raised on graphic novels – it’s not like they were illiterate – but the point remains this “new” medium brought about new types of readers and that is the type of connection I want to make.

So tell me again how did I get here from stopwatches? It seemed simple at first…duh.